Trump Cancels Planned Iran Strikes After Claiming 'Rough Framework' of Deal to Reopen Strait of Hormuz

President Donald Trump announced he has canceled planned joint U.S.-Israeli military strikes against Iran after claiming a "rough framework" for a peace deal has been reached, which would include the complete reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. However, Iranian officials immediately denied the claim, stating no agreement exists and the strait remains closed.

Trump Cancels Planned Iran Strikes After Claiming 'Rough Framework' of Deal to Reopen Strait of Hormuz

Image related to Trump Cancels Planned Iran Strikes After Claiming 'Rough Framework' of Deal to Reopen Strait of Hormuz. (Photo: Metro Daily Reporter)

Table of Contents

Trump’s Latest Iran ‘DEAL’

President Donald Trump announced late Saturday night that he has canceled planned joint U.S.-Israeli military strikes against Iran, claiming that Tehran and other Middle Eastern countries have agreed to the "parameters" of a peace deal . The emerging agreement, according to Trump's social media post on Truth Social, would include the "immediate, complete, and total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT, and an end to Iran's nuclear threat" . Trump stated he had agreed to cancel the attack "subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL" .

However, this latest announcement has been met with immediate denial from Iranian officials, who dismissed Trump's claim as a "new lie" and confirmed that the strategic waterway would remain closed as long as the U.S. continues "hostile actions" . The contradictory statements have created further confusion over the diplomatic efforts to end the five-month conflict that began on February 28 with Israeli and U.S. attacks on Iran .

A Pattern of 'Diplomatic Whiplash'

Trump's latest announcement follows a well-established pattern of the president first threatening massive strikes and then later calling them off, often within hours . This pattern of "diplomatic whiplash" has been a defining feature of the conflict, with the president alternating between three main positions: claiming an agreement is within reach, issuing direct threats of total military destruction, and abruptly announcing de-escalations shortly after delivering ultimatums .


The chronology of these reversals is extensive. On April 7, Trump issued a dramatic ultimatum warning that the U.S. would destroy "a whole civilization" if Iran refused to submit to his terms, only to reverse course 12 hours later by announcing a two-week suspension of hostilities . On April 21, he extended the ceasefire indefinitely . On May 18, he called off strikes after claiming "serious negotiations" were underway, only for fighting to resume by May 27 . On June 11, he canceled scheduled strikes hours after threatening to hit Iran "VERY HARD TONIGHT" . On June 17, he signed a 14-point memorandum of understanding with Iran, starting a 60-day negotiating clock . On July 27, after two weeks of intense daily strikes, he paused operations to give negotiations another chance . By August 1, he was again canceling planned strikes .

One source quipped that President Trump "truly deserves the Nobel Peace Prize because he has already ended the Iran war eight times," highlighting the skepticism with which these announcements are now received [citation:??]. According to CNN, Trump, since March, has claimed that the U.S. was close to an agreement with Iran or that peace was imminent more than 38 times .

Claims of a Deal and Denials from Tehran

Despite Trump's claims of a breakthrough, Iranian officials have been quick to deny any agreement. Iran's acting defense minister, Majid Ebn-e-Reza, said Trump had backed down "within the context of psychological operations and a war of calculations," and that Iranian forces would remain on alert . Iranian military officials dismissed Trump's claim that Tehran had asked for a halt to planned attacks as "merely another lie and a desperate attempt to blackmail Gulf rulers" . A source close to Iran's negotiating team told the semi-official Fars News Agency that "No agreement has been reached on reopening the Strait of Hormuz" . An informed military source also told Fars that the strategic waterway would remain closed as long as the U.S. continued "hostile actions" .


However, mediation efforts are ongoing. A regional official involved in the mediation efforts told the Associated Press that the proposal calls for reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and halting attacks across the region, including by Iranian-backed militias in Iraq on Arab Gulf countries and Jordan. In exchange, the U.S. would end its naval blockade on Iran and allow Tehran to export its oil . Hassan Ghashghavi, a spokesperson for the Iranian parliament's National Security Committee, confirmed that mediators were trying to revive the agreement brokered by Pakistan in June, and that "Discussions are underway, and there is a possibility that the Iranian side will return to Muscat" .

Pressure from Allies and Concerns About Retaliation

The decision to halt strikes came amid significant diplomatic pressure from regional allies. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman reportedly spoke with Trump by phone on Saturday and raised concerns about the U.S. potentially escalating the conflict with Iran . The Saudis, concerned that Tehran could respond with attacks on the energy infrastructure of the kingdom and other Gulf countries, urged Trump to de-escalate and refrain from launching the strikes .

Iran had warned this weekend against any "adventurous action" by the U.S. and said it would retaliate decisively . These threats came just hours after Kuwait's army said it had destroyed hostile drones launched by Iran against several vital facilities, and two ships were attacked off Oman in the Strait of Hormuz . Nournews, a media outlet affiliated with Iran's top security body, stated that U.S. attacks on Iranian energy infrastructure would prompt Iranian strikes on oilfields in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, as well as gasfields in Qatar and Israel .


Fragile Ceasefire and Unresolved Issues

The proposed deal would bring the sides back to the negotiating table, but many issues remain unresolved. Even if a final agreement is reached, concerns remain over the removal of naval mines from the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has reportedly deployed . Removing these mines will take months, and Iran could re-mine the strait at any moment, maintaining significant leverage . Furthermore, the memorandum of understanding signed on June 17 expired on August 16, adding a sense of urgency to the current negotiations . Iran's leadership also remains deeply divided over negotiations with the U.S., with radical factions in Tehran arguing that talks shouldn't take place at all, while more moderate elements favor negotiations as a complement to military action .

Rahul Deshmukh

Rahul Deshmukh

World News Editor
MA in International Relations • 11 years experience

Rahul Deshmukh reports on international affairs, diplomacy, geopolitics, and major global events with balanced, fact-driven journalism that provides readers with meaningful context.