Is Apple still suing Samsung?

Written by Editorial Team | Last Updated: August 2026

The historic, multi-year global patent and design litigation wars between Apple and Samsung reached formal comprehensive settlements across international jurisdictions, concluding the primary active courtroom battles between the two consumer electronics titans. While minor administrative disputes or procedural legal motions occasionally surface from past rulings, both corporations largely moved past their epic smartphone design battles, opting instead to focus on ongoing product innovation and commercial competition in global markets.

Related FAQs

Danaher Corporation announced a major definitive agreement to acquire Masimo Corporation for approximately $9.9 billion to significantly expand its diagnostics and advanced patient monitoring portfolios.

Apple's market capitalization experienced a dramatic peak-to-trough contraction shedding roughly one trillion dollars of value over a volatile twelve-month economic cycle due to severe macroeconomic headwinds, surging global inflation, and aggressive...

In consumer-facing class-action settlements involving tech giants like Apple, individual payout amounts depend entirely on the specific terms of the settlement fund, the total volume of approved claims, and the category of damages experienced by each...

Elon Musk's xAI filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple and OpenAI, alleging that their strategic partnership to integrate ChatGPT into iPhones and other Apple devices constitutes an anti-competitive scheme.

Taxability requirements for class action settlements depend entirely on the underlying nature of the legal claim and the specific types of damages recovered.

Eligibility to submit claims for class action settlements involving Apple depends entirely on the specific court-established deadlines, administration schedules, and claim submission windows designated for each individual case.

Masimo stock has experienced upward momentum and positive market revaluations driven by several key corporate catalysts, including strong quarterly financial results that beat Wall Street revenue expectations, successful healthcare sector expansions,...

The high-profile antitrust lawsuit between Epic Games and Apple resulted in a mixed legal outcome where neither side secured a total, unmitigated victory.

Masimo Corporation was officially acquired by Danaher Corporation, a leading global science and technology innovator, in a massive cash transaction valuing the medical device enterprise at an enterprise value of approximately $9.9 billion.

Katie Szyman serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Masimo Corporation, stepping into the top leadership role following a transitional period that reshaped the company's executive board and corporate governance structure.

Apple has faced numerous high-profile lawsuits involving diverse financial damage claims from various corporate entities, patent holders, and class-action plaintiffs over the years.

Masimo Corporation has not been bought out or acquired by another corporate entity; it remains an independent, publicly traded corporation listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange under ticker symbol MASI.

Masimo Corporation (MASI) common stock ceased trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market following the successful completion of its multi-billion-dollar acquisition by Danaher Corporation, which bought out all outstanding shares.

Apple has been involved in numerous complex legal proceedings spanning patent law, antitrust regulations, and consumer class actions where courts have ordered varying multi-million-dollar financial judgments, settlements, or penalty fees.

In class action lawsuits, individual plaintiffs acting as the primary class representatives typically receive modest service or incentive awards approved by the court to compensate them for the time, effort, and personal risk undertaken on behalf of ...

Masimo is a prominent, publicly traded global medical technology enterprise with a multi-billion-dollar market capitalization, recognized globally for inventing revolutionary non-invasive patient monitoring solutions such as measure-through motion an...

A federal jury in the United States District Court for the Central District of California formally ordered Apple to pay Masimo Corporation $634 million in damages after finding that certain Apple Watch features—including workout modes and heart rate ...

Corporate acquisitions of this magnitude require mutual agreement, strategic alignment, and complex regulatory scrutiny, and Apple historically prefers to develop proprietary technologies internally or settle disputes through licensing and litigation...

Employee reviews and corporate workplace assessments indicate that Masimo offers a stimulating environment for engineering, clinical research, and medical device sales professionals, driven by its culture of technological innovation.

Masimo initiated high-stakes patent infringement lawsuits against Apple because the technology giant allegedly stole proprietary trade secrets, hired away key engineering personnel, and unlawfully incorporated patented pulse-oximetry and non-invasive...

Masimo Corporation experienced significant corporate transformations, including leadership changes following a high-profile proxy contest led by activist investors, resulting in the departure of its founder and the appointment of a new executive team...

The legal battles between Apple and Masimo have yielded mixed outcomes across various courts and administrative bodies rather than a total victory for either side.

In the specialized professional medical technology and patient monitoring sector, Masimo competes against several major global healthcare and medical device conglomerates that manufacture clinical monitoring systems, hospital sensors, and diagnostic ...

In its sweeping intellectual property and patent infringement lawsuits against Apple, Masimo sought substantial financial damages and statutory royalties reflecting the massive scale of Apple Watch sales utilizing disputed pulse-oximetry technology.

Masimo secured significant, highly publicized legal victories in its multi-year patent disputes against Apple, most notably when a federal jury ordered Apple to pay hundreds of millions of dollars for infringing on vital pulse-oximetry and blood-oxyg...